Issue 35 November 2013

Dragonflies in Worcestershire 2013

Mike Averill

It seemed like a very long cold winter this year (2012-2013) and the lateness of any dragonfly records reflected this. Following a cold start in January and February, March was one of the coldest months since the 1960’s. Relentlessly the cold weather continued into April and then finally temperatures began struggle in to double figures in the third week of that month. Just as some species were beginning to appear it turned cooler again for a couple of weeks in mid May, only perking up at the end of the month. In terms of dragonfly emergences, this had a dramatic effect delaying all species by between one and six weeks compared to the earliest times in 2008-2012 (Table 1), except for the Small Red-eyed Damselfly which emerges later in the year anyway.

In terms of individual species, all the regular species were seen plus an occasional uncommon one: the Red-veined Darter which was seen at Grimley but not at its usual location at Pirton. The Club-tailed Dragonfly was 17 days late to emerge and the numbers counted were somewhat lower so perhaps some individuals will have delayed their emergence until next year. This can happen with a species that has a synchronised emergence because it is important for all the males and females to emerge together. This is particularly vital for a species like this that disperses widely after emergence. The Beautiful Demoiselle seems to expand its range each year appearing in more locations on the River Severn and even at Yardley near the River Cole. Croome Court had less Small-red Eyed Damselflies than last year but the same species was also seen at Lower Smite Farm. The fact that this species wasn’t late emerging compared to other years may be explained by the fact that it normally emerges later in the summer and so would have had time to recover from the early cold spell. The Four-spotted Chaser tends to pop up in more locations than it used to so it was nice to have proven breeding reports from Penny Hill, near Martley.

The unexpected arrival of the Scarce Chaser at Hillditch Pool, Hartlebury in 2012 gave rise to the possibility of a breeding colony there and so it was with excitement that the first larval cases were found in June this year. Whether such a small group will be self sustaining will make an interesting case study.

Dragonflies attracted to moth traps are not all that common and certainly not as common as in the United States where warm evenings and crepuscular activity often leads to dragonflies being drawn to light. In Worcestershire we had two instances via Val Weston this year: a Brown Hawker in Acocks Green and a Common Darter at Monkwood. This is nothing to do with feeding of course, merely the response to light in the way that birds and other day flying insects are attracted to lighthouses or ships lights.

For those who are eagerly awaiting the new national Dragonfly Atlas, the launch date will be May 2014 and a pre publication offer can be found at: http://www.field-studies-council.org/publications/pubs/atlas-of-dragonflies-in-britain-and-ireland.aspx

Common Name Scientific Name Earliest sighting 2008-12 Earliest sighting 2013 Days later than 2008-12
Large Red Damselfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula 09/04/2011 04/05/2013 25
Beautiful Demoiselle Calopteryx virgo 23/04/2011 22/05/2013 29
Blue-tailed Damselfly Ischnura elegans 23/04/2011 22/05/2013 29
Common Blue Damselfly Enallagma cyathigerum 23/04/2011 13/05/2013 20
Azure Damselfly Coenagrion puella 24/04/2009 25/05/2013 31
Banded Demoiselle Calopteryx splendens 26/04/2011 25/05/2013 29
Red-eyed Damselfly Erythromma najas 26/04/2011 22/05/2013 26
Broad-bodied Chaser Libellula depressa 26/04/2011 01/06/2013 36
Four-spotted Chaser Libellula quadrimaculata 02/05/2011 31/05/2013 29
Common Club-tail Gomphus vulgatissimus 03/05/2011 20/05/2013 17
Hairy Dragonfly Brachytron pratense 05/05/2011 Not Seen
White-legged Damselfly Platycnemis pennipes 08/05/2009 03/06/2013 26
Black-tailed Skimmer Orthetrum cancellatum 08/05/2011 04/06/2013 26
Southern Hawker Aeshna cyanea 14/05/2012 29/06/2013 46
Scarce Chaser Libellula fulva 22/05/2011 09/06/2013 18
Brown Hawker Aeshna grandis 24/05/2009 30/06/2013 34
Emperor Dragonfly Anax imperator 30/05/2008 08/06/2013 8
Common Darter Sympetrum striolatum 30/05/2008 30/06/2013 30
Red-veined Darter Sympetrum fonscolombii 31/05/2009 17/06/2013 Migrant
Golden-ringed Dragonfly Cordulegaster boltonii 09/06/2012 12/07/2013 1 record
Emerald Damselfly Lestes sponsa 15/06/2011 29/06/2013 14
Ruddy Darter Sympetrum sanguineum 16/06/2010 09/07/2013 23
Common Hawker Aeshna juncea 26/06/2010 Not Seen
Lesser Emperor Anax parthenope 07/07/2011 Not Seen
Small Red-eyed Damselfly Erythromma viridulum 11/07/2011 14/07/2013 3
Migrant Hawker Aeshna mixta 22/07/2009 07/08/2013 16
Black Darter Sympetrum danae 12/09/2009 Not Seen

Table 1. Dragonfly emergence dates. 2008-2012 compared with 2013.

Introduction to the Noble Chafer Gnorimus nobilis (Linnaeus, 1758) Leverhulme research project

Adam Bates1, Max Blake2, Deborah Harvey3, Laura Bower4, Lauren Alexander4, Lloyd Jenkins1, Jon Sadler1*, Niall McKeown2, Paul Shaw2, Alan Gange3 and Harry Green5

1 The University of Birmingham, * Project lead, 2 Aberystwyth University, 3Royal Holloway, University of London, 4 People’s Trust for Endangered Species (PTES), and 5 Worcestershire Biological Records Centre (WBRC).

Worcestershire’s natural heritage is the product of centuries of interaction between the natural environment and human land use. The last 50 years have been characterised by a decline in traditional farming methods, posing a threat to landscape and cultural heritage, and to the habitats and diversity of species that have developed in tandem over many centuries. This issue is well illustrated in the production of orchard fruits, for which changing markets have led to traditional orchards being grubbed out and replaced by more economically profitable crops and more commercially viable fruit stock. This decline in traditional orchards is of concern both because of the loss of irreplaceable cultural resources, and the loss of an important habitat akin to wood pasture. One species of conservation concern, and a local Worcestershire speciality, is the Noble Chafer beetle Gnorimus nobilis(Linnaeus, 1758) (01), believed to have declined in abundance and distribution due to its orchard habitat deterioration, habitat loss and, perhaps, fragmentation of habitat.

The Leverhulme Trust funded project entitled ‘Integrating ecology and social science in conservation: Orchards, beetles, and agroecology’ started in October 2012, and focuses on the ecology of the Noble Chafer and the management of the traditional orchards with which it is associated. The project partners are the University of Birmingham, Aberystwyth University, Royal Holloway University of London, and the People’s Trust for Endangered Species (PTES), but it has benefited from close collaboration with the Worcestershire Biological Records Centre (WBRC), Worcestershire Wildlife Trust and Vale Landscape Heritage Trust amongst various other groups. As the project title suggests, the project encompasses ecological and social science approaches to the study of the Noble Chafer and traditional orchard management. The simultaneous study of one insect species and its habitat by so many people of varying disciplines is unusual, and a golden opportunity for better understanding the ecology of the Noble Chafer alongside the wider cultural and biological significance of orchards.

As with many species in the Worcestershire landscape, the fate of the Noble Chafer is strongly dependent on the management decisions taken by people. So an understanding of the motivation behind, and techniques used for, orchard management across the wide-ranging stakeholders (e.g. conservationists, cider producers, county councils) is essential if such species are to be conserved in the working landscape. Through informal semi-structured interviews in the county, we will explore the range of attitudes and approaches in orchard management, to better understand why some stakeholders see the conservation of species such as the Noble Chafer as an associated or more important goal than simple productivity maximisation.

Much about the ecology of Noble Chafer larvae and adults in and around their main orchard habitat remains relatively poorly known. Thanks to distinctive larval frass (droppings), the recent presence of Noble Chafer in rot holes and other deadwood features can be determined, and this has facilitated the gathering of good knowledge of Noble Chafer distribution in many areas, and can be used to investigate tree and orchard habitat features associated with Noble Chafer occupancy. However, frass could potentially be present in deadwood for some time after Noble Chafer have stopped using the tree, and the presence of frass gives little information about the abundance of larvae in a tree. We are therefore using techniques to identify larval pheromones that will help to monitor larvae without disrupting the deadwood habitat or larvae.

Noble Chafer adults are relatively easy to spot when the observer is in the right place at the right time, and can be tagged relatively easily to differentiate individuals. This has allowed us to gather data on the weather conditions and time of day when adults are able to feed and fly. Controls on dispersal and feeding may influence population fitness by determining migration ability and perhaps the fecundity of adults. Being in the right place at the right time tends to require considerable observer effort, and observers cannot be in multiple places at once. Therefore we are developing methods to capture adults using pheromone attractants. This will allow the identification of orchards currently occupied by Noble Chafer and the estimation of the size of populations using capture, mark, release methods. Such detection methods are likely to be particularly useful for Noble Chafer monitoring where populations are patchily distributed and the flight season is quite short.

This smaller scale work will be complemented by investigation of the landscape scale variables influencing Noble Chafer distribution using biological records and orchard survey records collected over many years. These records will be incorporated into a geographical information system (GIS) of the region to create data on the amount of coverage of built areas, woodland, and other orchards at a variety of spatial scales. The current distribution of Noble Chafer is very likely to be influenced by the historical distribution of orchards in the region, perhaps representing a kind of ghost of landscapes past. So historical data will be included in the GIS (e.g. 02.) and its influence on current distributions investigated. This historical component also provides a direct link to the strand of the project using molecular genetics approaches.

Direct knowledge of the pre-historic distribution and habitat of Noble Chafer before widespread human landscape change is lost. However, following human alteration of the landscape, and before the wide-spread planting of orchards, it seems likely that Noble Chafer (based on the ecology of other Eurasian populations, and sub-fossil beetles found in bog Oaks) used open wood pasture as its primary habitat in the UK. At some point in time the primary habitat choice of this species switched to orchards, which for a relatively brief period (in evolutionary terms) covered large areas of the Worcestershire landscape. The recent loss of orchards has perhaps isolated Noble Chafer habitat to such an extent that adults are now unable to easily disperse between habitat patches. This is likely to have led to the genetic character of different populations becoming distinct, and perhaps even to genetic biodiversity loss resulting from inbreeding. We plan to use modern genetic methods (DNA “fingerprinting”) to reconstruct the species’ past and present ecology and population dynamics. If evidence suggests that between-habitat dispersal is rare, conservation efforts should aim to preserve habitat connectivity in the Worcestershire landscape. If the evidence suggests frequent long-distance dispersal between habitats, then conservation efforts can focus more closely on improving habitat conditions in orchard reserves.

Large-scale removal of Noble Chafer individuals for DNA analysis could reduce the fitness of local populations, which would be unacceptable given the conservation importance of this species. So at the start of the project our objective was to develop new methods to obtain Noble Chafer genetic material non-invasively from its distinctive larval frass (droppings), i.e. avoiding mass sampling of living individuals. Remarkably, we found that frass often yields enough DNA to test how genetic diversity of Noble Chafer varies between populations separated by varying distance across the country. However, for some important methods frass-derived DNA is too degraded to use, and so we need to source DNA from adult tissue. Lethal sampling of insects can be controversial, but this project is aiming to be completely ‘no-kill’: small numbers of adults can be taken into captivity from strong populations, used to establish breeding colonies and then removed for genetic analysis only when they die. This procedure will let us study the adults and resulting larvae in captivity to learn more about species biology and ecology, as well as providing stock populations from which reintroductions to the wild can be made if necessary.

How people can help

Investigation of the habitat and landscape variables influencing the distribution of Noble Chafer is only possible thanks to the work of the many people over many years who have gathered records of Noble Chafer frass, larvae and adults, and documented associated habitat characteristics. Such records are, of course, never complete, and there is always scope for people to add to the body of knowledge of the distribution of Noble Chafer and traditional orchards. In particular, there are two ways to help: 1. send records of Noble Chafer frass and adults to the WBRC; and 2. volunteering to survey orchards as part of the PTES traditional orchards survey.

1. Recording Noble Chafer

The easiest way to detect the presence of Noble Chafer in an orchard is by the discovery of its distinctive frass. Described as being a little like coffee granules, the hard frass of Noble Chafer gathers in rot holes and other crevices of trees that are occupied by the beetle larvae (3.), and can be sampled from the surface of wood mulch using a long-handled spoon. Samples can be sent to the WBRC for confirmation and some samples are passed on to Aberystwyth University for genetic analysis. Some stages of the Noble Chafer life-cycle, particularly the eggs and pupae, can be damaged by exploration of wood mulch, so gathering larval records is discouraged. Adults are most easily spotted feeding on Common Hogweed Heracleum sphondylium L., Elder Sambucus nigra L., and Meadowsweet Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. in June, July and early August. Preliminary results from the study suggest that the weather does not have to be warm for this (particularly when close to the host orchard), and that the morning and early afternoon are the best times to see them. Adults can be reliably sexed in the field using two main characteristics: the shape of the meta-tibia (middle leg) (04 & 05) and the presence or absence of a notch on the pygidium (end of abdomen) (06 & 07). The easiest way to remember which is which is to remember that the male is on top during copulation, and uses its characteristic middle legs to help lock onto the back of the female, which fits snugly into the males’ bowed middle legs (08).

2. PTES orchard surveys

Using a combination of recent and old maps, and aerial photographs, the PTES have created a map of the location and shape of all the likely traditional orchards for the whole of England and Wales. Through lots of volunteer effort, many of these orchards have been ground-truthed and surveyed for habitat character and signs of Noble Chafer. However, many orchards in Worcestershire still need surveying, so every new volunteer is important. People who are interested in volunteering can contact Lauren Alexander at the PTES (www.ptes.org/orchards, lauren.alexander@ptes.org, 020 74984533).

Goals of the project

The aim of the project is to use the knowledge gained of the ecology, distribution and management of Noble Chafer to better inform future conservation of this species. We hope to be able to answer questions such as:

What motivations do multiple stakeholders share for management practises that favour Noble Chafer conservation, and how can these motivations be encouraged?

What orchard management practises create the most favourable Noble Chafer habitat?

How do suitable orchard habitats need to be distributed in the Worcestershire landscape to ensure the continued success of this species?

How might different future scenarios of landscape change affect Noble Chafer populations in Worcestershire?

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Worcestershire Wildlife Trust, Vale Landscape Heritage Trust, Natural England, Wyre Forest Study Group, and Cedric and Thelma Qualye for helping to track down and/or providing access to intensive study sites; and the Leverhulme Trust for funding this research. We would also like to thank all the people that have given up their time to provide samples for the study (in particular Jenny Schenke), and participate in semi-structured interviews. This work will hopefully build upon the large body of information gathered on Noble Chafer and orchard ecology by a number of volunteers and investigators over many years.

Images

  01. Male Noble Chafer feeding on Meadowsweet Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim., illustrating the distinctive male meta-tibia and lack of notched pygidium, photograph by David Shute.

  02. Example distribution map of top fruit orchard cover in 1932.

  03. Frass of Noble Chafer larvae in a hollow plum trunk, photograph Adam Bates. Beware, frass is not always as easy as this to find, often there is far less frass than this.

  04. Gnorimus nobilis male mesotibia (middle section of middle leg). By Siga

  05 Gnorimus nobilis female mesotibia (middle section of middle leg). By Siga

  06. Gnorimus nobilis male pygidium (upper surface of the tip of the abdomen). By Siga

  07. Gnorimus nobilis female pygidium (upper surface of the tip of the abdomen). By Siga

  08 Gnorimus nobilis copulating pair underneath a Hogweed flower head. Harry Green.

Pediopsis tiliae (Germar, 1831) Lime Leafhopper in Worcestershire.

John Bingham & Denise Bingham

Family: Cicadellidae.Homoptera leafhopper (Lime leafhopper). Nationally Notable B.

This small leafhopper (length 5-6 mm) (01) was swept up by Denise Bingham on 27 July 2013 at Shrawley Wood, Worcestershire. The site was a woodland ride with tall herbage under a canopy of small-leaved lime Tilia cordata.

According to Auchenorrhyncha Recording Scheme this appears to be the second record for Worcestershire with a previous record from SO94, somewhere near Pershore. Widely distributed but scarce in southern Britain, including the south-east Midlands and associated with lime trees Tilia, particularly small-leaved lime (British Bugs web site). The leafhopper is National Scarce B. This record is towards the limit of the currently known distribution (02) although Dr Alan Stewart has recently recorded it at Preston Montford, Shropshire (SJ41).

The species is quite striking with the bright yellow and brown markings. Although according to British Bugs web site some species of Macropsis or Oncopsis can look superficially similar, the combination of the plain yellow face and brown wings is distinctive.

With so much Tilia in Worcestershire this leafhopper may turn out to be a fairly common species, but clearly it’s not recorded often. It is adult from June to September.

Acknowledgements.

Many thanks to Dr Joe Botting at British Bugs who confirmed our identification and Dr Alan Stewart (Auchenorrhyncha recording scheme) for information on the distribution.

References and information

British Bugs at http://www.britishbugs.org.uk/

Auchenorrhyncha Recording Scheme http://www.ledra.co.uk/index.html

  01.Pediopsis tiliae Shrawley Wood. John Bingham

  02. Pediopsis tiliae national distribution

Hoof Fungus Fomes fomentarius an update

John Bingham

In the Worcestershire Record of November 2011 (Bingham 2011) I reported on Alan Brown’s discovery of Fomes fomentarius (Hoof Fungus) on the Devil’s Spittleful Nature Reserve near Kidderminster. The fungus was discovered to be present on quite a few mature birch Betula pendula trees scattered around the Devil’s Spittleful rock. Thankfully many of the old trees were retained during the heathland restoration works and the fungus has so far survived at the site. At the time I wondered if this predominantly northern species was overlooked in Worcestershire with possibly more sites occurring on the sandy soils around the Kidderminster area.

During a fungus foray to Kingsford County Park north of Kidderminster on the very border with Staffordshire on the 10 September 2013 I chanced on another group of Fomes fomentarius growing on suitable old and over mature birch trees, including some fallen birch trunks. The area was mature secondary woodland and no doubt it would have been heathland in the not too distant past. Again, the site was on sandy soil and free draining. So if anyone is visiting secondary woodland on the sandstones of Kidderminster keep a look out for Fomes, it might well be quite a common species but restricted to growing over mature birch trees.

Reference

Bingham, J. 2011. Hoof Fungus Fomes fomentarius at the Devil’s Spittleful Nature Reserve. Worcestershire Record 31:26.

Notes on some invertebrates found in Worcestershire in 2013

John Bingham and Denise Bingham

The cold dull spring of 2013 was a disappointing time for finding invertebrates and although the summer weather improved species seemed to remain elusive.

Silpha tristis, Illiger, 1798. Silphidae: Coeloptera. Local (01).

Found at Shrawley Wood on 7 May 2013 under tree canopy on woodland herbage. Silpha tristis is very similar to the more common Silpha atrata, however S. tristis is slightly larger and has more even puncturation on the pronutum and elytra. Although rare it appears to have been recorded quite a few times in Worcestershire. Alan Brown reported good numbers from Springfield Park, Kidderminster (Brown 2012). Rosemary Winnall reported one from Ismere, near Kidderminster and another from Longdon Wood, Wyre Forest,(Shropshire) both taken in May 2010 (Pers.comm.). Brett Westwood also reported a sighting near Kidderminster. (Pers. comm). It might be worthwhile collating all the records as this species may be locally common.

Paederus fuscipes, Curt,1840. Staphylinidae:Coleoptera National Scarce (02).

This colourful beetle was found on 16 July 2013 on bare mud at Wilden Marsh Nature Reserve, Kidderminster. Good numbers were seen scurrying over the wet mud and diving into the opening crevices. Thanks to Paul Whitehead for providing the identification, Paul’s comment on the species was “although Nationally Scarce is relatively frequently encountered in the county’s major river valleys and also at a number of ‘artificial’ wetlands across the region”.

This Genus of beetle apparently can cause a dermatitis or skin irritation resulting from contact with the beetle. Information from Wikipedia was quite interesting although I have no idea how correct this is or if it applies to our Paederus beetles in the UK.

Quote: Once pederin is on the skin from the initial beetle contact, it may also be spread elsewhere on the skin. Washing the hands and skin with soap and water is strongly recommended if contact with a rove beetle has occurred. Initial skin contact with pederin shows no immediate result. Within 12–36 hours, however, a reddish rash appears, which develops into blisters. Irritation, including crusting and scaling, may last from two to three weeks’. (Wikipedia). It appear to be more problematic in places like Iran where the beetles are common in some locations and may be the cause or source of one of the Biblical plagues! So take care if you find any Paederus beetles.

Arytaina genistae, Latreille,1804. Family: Psyllidae Broom Psyllid (03).

Collected by Denise Bingham on 3 August on the recording day at Devil’s Spittleful, Kidderminster. Beaten off broom Cytisus scopularia. According to British Bugs the dark streaks in the wing cells are a diagnostic feature. Length 3.5 mm. Found abundantly on broom and overwinters on conifers. Widespread and common in the UK. Our thanks to Dr Joe Botting for confirming the identification.

Athysanus argentarius, Metcalf, 1955 Family: Cicadellidae. Leafhopper (04).

This leafhopper was found by Denise Bingham on 3 August on the recording day at Devil’s Spittleful, Kidderminster beaten off broom Cytisus scopularia. A large pale straw-coloured species, length 6.5-8 mm, with a dark line parallel to the front of the vertex, continuing across the eyes. There is a narrow longitudinal line along the scutellum and posterior half of the pronotum, with intermittent lateral lines parallel to that. (British Bugs).

According to the British Bugs web page this species was considered scarce and confined to coastal areas in the south-east but now become established inland across parts of central and southern England and can be found in a variety of grassland habitats. Our thanks to Dr Joe Botting for confirming the identification..

Scymnus frontalis, Fabricius , 1787. Coccinellidae:Coleoptera: Ladybird (05).

This ladybird was swept up from long grass by Denise Bingham on 3 August on the recording day at Devil’s Spittleful, Kidderminster but not checked until after the meeting. Gary Farmer also independently found this species at the same meeting. So two records were obtained of this uncommon ladybird.

References and information

British Bugs. http://www.britishbugs.org.uk/

Auchenorrhyncha Recording Scheme. http://www.ledra.co.uk/index.html

Wikipedia information – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paederus_dermatitis

Brown, A. 2012 Coleoptera of note in the Kidderminster area, Winter 2011-2012. Worcestershire Record 33:13-19.

  01. Silpha tristis. John Bingham

  02. Paederus fuscipes. John Bingham

  03. Arytaina genistae. John Bingham

  04. Athysanus argentarius. John Bingham

  05. Scymnus frontalis. John Bingham.

Some interesting behaviour of two species of Carabus Ground Beetles

Alan Brown

While night-hunting for Ground Beetles down at the Devils Spittleful in Kidderminster I was given a really unique insight into some unusual behaviour by our two native Violet Ground Beetles, namely Carabus violaceus and Carabus problematicus.

Both species are adaptable to open as well as woodland habitats, but what I didn’t realise was that both species are partially arboreal, spending quite a bit of their time in trees. It may have been a rather naïve assumption by myself at the time, but I had always had the impression that these two large, flightless Ground Beetle species were strictly ground specialists, hence the name ground of the beetle group. But I got a surprise when I went looking for them at night with a headband torch. I soon began to realise that both these species are adept at climbing trees. Tree Slugs Limax marginatus seemed to be the preferred food item, the beetle having to hold its prey high in the air in order to make its way laboriously back down to ground level. But they are generalist predators and I also saw them with caterpillars, sawfly larvae, moths and even snake millipedes on occasion. They also tolerate each other’s presence on the same tree. I would sometimes find up to four individual beetles together investigating the same small patch of decaying wood, or find two feeding on the same food item, but never have I seen any aggression shown towards each other, which surprised me as well.

However, the most curious behaviour I observed happened in July and August when the sap-runs on the older oak trees came into their own. These sap-runs attract a number of insect species: moths, sap beetles and Lesser Stag Beetles Dorcas parallelipipedus. To my surprise I would regularly see Violet Ground Beetles gorging themselves on these same sap-runs until their abdomens became totally distended. They showed no interest in the moths or other insects feeding alongside them except to jostle for position with them for access. It was also noted that none of the other ground beetle species, especially the more arboreal Dromius or Spilotus types, took an interest in these same sap-runs. I met with the same scenario every time I went down there and observed this behaviour with both Carabus violaceus and Carabus problematicus and this wasn’t the only type of “nectar” source they used. I have also seen them tucking into over-ripe blackberries on the ground and chewing on developing leaf buds as well. Four oak sap-runs were kept under observation, each about five or six feet from the ground. Three of them were in the wooded area that surrounds the heath and the forth on an isolated oak on the heath itself. In both habitats Carabus problematicus was the most numerous Carabusspecies seen, with both Carabus violaceus and Cychrus caraboides being present in low numbers. In the spring large numbers of Carabus nemoraliscan also be found on the grassland areas of the heath, but sightings of this species usually tail off by July when the sap-runs come into their own.

Although the vast majority of Violet Ground Beetles sightings throughout the year at the site were made on the ground, I continued to find individuals scaling the trees, sometimes up to twenty feet from the ground, looking for prey. What I did notice was that their sharp tarsal claws are especially suited for gripping onto the bark of trees and it is not easy to dislodge them once they have a good grip. This activity probably does make them particularly vulnerable to owls, as they are to some extent exposed.

Of course I am only commenting on woodland behaviour and these two species of Violet Ground Beetle. They can survive just as well in gardens without sap-runs and without trees, which just goes to show how adaptable they are. At least in part sap-runs do seem to provide an extra food resource at the Devils Spittleful and also provide a unique insight into the behaviour of these two species. Although one photograph (1) shows Carabus problematicus jostling for position on a small sap seepage on an oak with a Lesser Stag Beetle, it is important to stress that no biting occurred even though this jostling went on for some time. A bite from a Lesser Stag Beetle is well capable of piercing the ground beetles armour however, so perhaps the ground beetle was putting itself in some danger here? Two other photographs (2 & 3) show a Carabus problematicus and Carabus violaceus at sap-runs about six feet from the ground. It usually took about half-an-hour for each one to ingest enough sap before its abdomen was totally distended and it decided that it had had enough. The last photograph (4) shows a Carabus problematicus on its way down a birch tree with a snake millipede (species unknown), extracted from the fissure shown on the left, six feet from the ground.

Images

  1 Carabus problematicus and Lesser Stag Beetle Dorcas parallelipipedus 1 Carabus problematicus and Lesser Stag Beetle Dorcas parallelipipedus jostling at sap-run. A. Brown

  2 Carabus problematicus on sap run. A. Brown

  3 Carabus violaceus on Oak sap-run. A. Brown

  4 Carabus problematicus with snake millipede. A. Brown

Coleoptera of note found in the Kidderminster area 2010-2013

Alan Brown

In truth, for various reasons I was unable to conduct a proper survey in 2013 for notable beetle species and the time I did spend looking was mainly to try and find additional sites for the ant-associate hister beetle Haeterius ferrugineus. However, I did have enough material put by of species which for one reason or another didn’t appear in my previous articles. Some of these species are really good finds, whilst others are more widespread and some are county first records.

All these species were found at night with a headband torch and, unless stated, most were found to be active after dark on the surface of bark or on the ground. The smaller species are generally easier to spot when they are moving and much information regarding behaviour was also observed, making this ongoing survey a real bonus.

Curculio betulae: Curculionidae: Notable B: 6.8.2012. One of the catkin weevils this species is supposed to be a specialist of Birch catkins, but despite a thorough search I was unable to find it on this so I switched my search to Alder seed cones and found two almost immediately on trees at Puxton Marsh.

Platycis minutus: Lycidae: Notable B: 1.10.2012. A net-winged beetle. This is a diurnal species which seems to be spreading rapidly. Recently found at the Wyre Forest. This one was found inactive on a log in a very shaded area of wet-woodland at the Spennells Valley Nature Reserve (NR).

Tetratoma desmarestii: Tetratomidae: Notable B: 4.11.2012. A nocturnal fungus beetle and another winter active species. I found these on decaying oak branches infested with the Crust Fungus, Peniophora quercina in woodland at Springfield Park.

Melasis buprestoides: Eucnemidae: Notable B: 4.6.2012. A false click-beetle. I would usually find these literally boring their way into decaying Oak branches at the Devils Spittleful Nature Reserve, and on decaying Birch boughs at Hurcott Wood.

Epiphanus cornutus: Eucnemidae: local. A False Click-beetle and an accidental introduction which is rapidly increasing its range. Found on various decaying wood. I found this one on a decaying Beech log at Hurcott Wood.

Melandrya caraboides: Melandryidae: Notable B: 30.5.2012. A Darkling Beetle which is a diurnal species that develops in decaying wood. I found this one inactive at night on a decaying log infested with fungus in an open area of Springfield Park.

Arhopalus ferus: Cerambycidae: local: 28.6.2012. The Burnt Pine Longhorn. An introduced species which is nocturnal and extremely scarce in the Midlands. I was lucky to find this one investigating a dead-standing Pine tree in Hurcott Wood.

Poecilium alni: Cerambycidae: Notable B: 26.5.2012. The White-banded Longhorn. A rapidly spreading Longhorn beetle linked to decaying wood. I found this usually diurnal species on a large Oak stump at the Devils Spittleful NR. Length 6mm.

Saperda populnea: Cerambycidae: local: 15.5.2011. Small Poplar Borer. A local Longhorn beetle. I found this species on small Aspen saplings growing on grassland at the Devils Spittleful NR. Length:15mm.

Anaglyptus mysticus: Cerambycidae: Notable B: 19.5.2011. The Rufous-shouldered Longhorn beetle. I found this species hiding in a fissure on a Sycamore bough and also on a decaying Hawthorn trunk at Springfield Park. Length:10mm.

Phymatodes testaceus: Cerambycidae: local: 2.6.2011. Tanbark Borer. A nocturnal species, this is the orange colour variation for this species. I usually found this species investigating decaying Oak trunks and on a log-pile at Springfield Park . Length:18mm.

Platyrhinus resinosus: Anthribidae: Notable B: 2.6.2011. A fungus weevil. I came across a number of these linked to cramp-ball fungus on decaying beech logs, but also on a decaying ash stump with Dryads Saddle fungus in open parkland at Springfield Park.

Notaris scirpii: Curculionidae: Notable B: 6.4.2010. A herb-feeding weevil. I found a number of this Marshland species on Reed Sweet-grass and various other plants alongside Puxton Marsh.

Thanatophilus sinuatus: Silphidae: local : 1.10.2011. A seldom seen carrion beetle. I found a single specimen active at night on a dead pigeon alongside the Devils Spittleful NR.

Aphodius distinctus: Scarabaeidae: Notable B: 18.4.2011. A local dung beetle that seems to be doing well in my area. Linked to rabbit dung, I found this one on sandy heathland at the Devils Spittleful NR, but also on sandy, arable fields.

Aphodius zenkeri: Scarabaeidae: Notable B: 21.6.2011. A scarce dung beetle linked to deer dung. This species may be benefitting from the spread of the Muntjac Deer. I found this one on a pathway in Hurcott Wood and also saw another on the Devils Spittleful NR.

Aphodius ictericus: Scarabaeidae: Local: 22.4.2011. A local dung beetle. I found this one close to horse dung on open heathland at the Devils Spittleful NR.

Plegaderus vulneratus: Histeridae: scarce: 22.4.2010. A small hister beetle. A naturalised introduction, this species is thought to be predatory. Up to now it has been restricted to the east and south-east of the country. I found this species investigating beetle galleries on Pine. Species identified by Paul Whitehead. Length: 2mm

Plegaderus dissectus: Histeridae: Notable B: 28.6.2011. A small hister beetle usually linked to decaying deciduous trees. I found this species usually on damp, decaying birch stumps at the Devils Spittleful NR and at Hurcott Wood. Length: 2mm

Philonthus scitus: Staphylionidae: Notable B: 22.5.2012. A rove beetle linked to decaying wood situations. Found this predatory species on a decaying Oak tree at Springfield Park, but I’ve also seen it on a hollow Birch trunk at the Devils Spittleful NR.

Deleaster dichrous: Staphylionidae: Notable B: 12.8.2010. A predatory rove beetle found during my ground beetle survey. I found these alongside the River Severn in Bewdley on damp clay or sandy river margins, usually under grasses.

Orchesia micans: Melandryidae: local: 1.10.2012. A false darkling beetle that is usually in shaded woodland localities. I found a number of these active on a dead-standing Alder tree with fungus at the Spennells Valley NR in wet-woodland.

Orchesia minor: Melandryidae: Notable B: 6.7.2013. An uncommon false darkling beetle. I found this species in shaded woodland investigating a decaying Beech log with fungus at Hurcott Wood. Identification confirmed by Paul Whitehead. (No picture).

Hylastes ater: Scolytidae: local: 28.4.2013. A bark beetle linked to pine trees. I found a number of these actively investigating a decaying pine high-stump in a section of pine woodland at Hurcott Wood. Identification confirmed by Paul Whitehead. (No picture)

Hylastes opacus: Scolytidae: local : 28.4.2013. A bark beetle linked to various decaying wood situations. I found this one investigating some decaying bark on a Beech trunk near a section of pine woodland at Hurcott Wood. Identification confirmed by Paul Whitehead.

Variimorda villosa: Mordellidae: Notable B: 9.7.2012. A tumbling flower beetle. The adults feed on pollen but the larvae are predatory, feeding on bark beetle larvae in decaying wood. I found this adult on a decaying Sycamore tree, inactive at night. Hurcott Wood.

Ischnomera cyanea: Oedemeridae: Notable B: 27.5.2012. A handsome beetle usually found on flowers but like this one can also be found on bark beetle galleries laying its eggs. The larvae are predatory feeding on various bark beetle larvae. Found on a decaying Holly trunk. Spennells Valley NR.

Margarinotus purpurescens: Histeriidae: local: 15.5.2012. A hister beetle that is linked to mammal dung and decaying vegetable matter. It also seems to like dry, sandy areas around Kidderminster. I found this one on a sandy roadside verge.

HEMIPTERA

Empicoris vagabundus: Reduviidae : local: 1.10.2012. A Thread-legged Assassin bug. This is the most widespread and largest species, but surprisingly difficult to find. I have seen three of this predatory species to date, all were found in patches of woodland, two on Birch trunks and one on a Sycamore tree. Length: 7mm

Images

  01 Curculio betulae: Curculionidae: Notable B: 6.8.2012.

  02 Platycis minutus: Lycidae: Notable B: 1.10.2012

  03 Tetratoma desmarestii: Tetratomidae: Notable B: 4.11.2012

  04 Melasis buprestoides: Eucnemidae: Notable B: 4.6.2012.

  05 Epiphanus cornutus: Eucnemidae: local

  06 Melandrya caraboides: Melandryidae: Notable B: 30.5.2012.

  07 Arhopalus ferus: Cerambycidae: local: 28.6.2012

  08 Poecilium alni: Cerambycidae: Notable B: 26.5.2012

  09 Saperda populnea: Cerambycidae: local: 15.5.2011

  10 Anaglyptus mysticus: Cerambycidae: Notable B: 19.5.2011

  11 Phymatodes testaceus: Cerambycidae: local: 2.6.2011

  12 Platyrhinus resinosus: Anthribidae: Notable B: 2.6.2011

  13 Notaris scirpii: Curculionidae: Notable B: 6.4.2010

  14 Thanatophilus sinuatus: Silphidae: local: 1.10.2011

  15 Aphodius distinctus: Scarabaeidae: Notable B: 18.4.2011

  16 Aphodius zenkeri: Scarabaeidae: Notable B: 21.6.2011

  17 Aphodius ictericus: Scarabaeidae: Local: 22.4.2011

  18 Plegaderus vulneratus: Histeridae: scarce: 22.4.2010

  19 Plegaderus dissectus: Histeridae: Notable B: 28.6.2011

  20 Philonthus scitus: Staphylionidae: Notable B: 22.5.2012

  21 Deleaster dichrous: Staphylionidae: Notable B: 12.8.2010

  22 Orchesia micans: Melandryidae: local: 1.10.2012

  23 Hylastes opacus: Scolytidae: local: 28.4.2013

  24 Variimorda villosa: Mordellidae: Notable B: 9.7.2012

  25 Ischnomera cyanea: Oedemeridae: Notable B: 27.5.2012.

  26 Margarinotus purpurescens: Histeriidae: local: 15.5.2012

  27 Empicoris vagabundus: Reduviidae local: 1.10.2012